The Best Shots of 2022
Ringer illustration From âNopeâ to âThe Fabelmans,â this year featured plenty of perfect compositions Note: I did not see Avatar: The Way of Water in time for this list, and itâs just as well, sinceâwith a few subtle exceptionsâI usually try to emphasize non-CGI-assisted images in this feature. James Cameronâs status as Hollywoodâs reigning master of seamless, weightless unreality is uncontested, and unlike so many of the directors doing assembly-line work for big-ticket intellectual properties, he actually has a wonderful visual imagination: Generations of genre filmmakers are in his debt. With the Pandoraâs box of Avatar off the table then, I strove to identifyâand annotateâthe compositions (or camera movements) that either crystallized or transcended my memories of the movies around them, several of which ranked among the yearâs best. As usual, a list like this is deeply subjective, and so is the idea of what constitutes a perfect (or extraordinary) shotâwhether the goal should be showing off or self-effacement. My only hope is that these 10 images lead you in the direction of a worthwhile cinematic experience (or 10). Aftersun A24 The photograph coming slowly into focus here serves as an ideal emblem for Charlotte Wellsâs debut feature, Aftersun. Itâs an ostensibly candid moment veilingâand then revealingâsome deeper, sadder truth. Chewing over their joint holiday as they prepare to return to their separate homes, Calum (Paul Mescal) and his daughter Sophie (Frankie Corio) allow their minds to wander briefly to the idea of a never-ending beach vacationâan idyll away from the responsibilities awaiting them in the UK. âWhy,â asks Sophie in a small, happy voice, âcanât we just stay?â The answer is as simpleâand, in context, as quietly devastatingâas the photographâs development. Time moves forward no matter what, frozen only artificially (and futilely) by memory, or, more reliably, emulsion. Wells holds on the shot for what feels like a miniature eternity, as if she canât bear to let the details sharpenâor to let go of her characters and their bond, leading to a final segment thatâs dominated by melancholy evocations of departure both literal and (meta)physical. At once nostalgic and unsparing, Aftersun is the cinematic equivalent of a long goodbye; the photograph, which is special precisely because itâs so ordinary, leaves Sophie (and us) with something to hold on to. Decision to Leave CJ Entertainment There are two sides to every story, and in his dazzling new thriller Decision to Leave, South Korean auteur Park Chan-wook skillfully emphasizes duality at every turn. Working in tandem with cinematographer Kim Ji-yong, Parkâwho rightly won a directing prize at Cannesâgenerates visual interest in nearly every frame, all without overwhelming the humming momentum of the story. One trick works especially well: When shooting interiors, he places his characters behind glass or against mirrors to hint at the multitudes they contain. Case in point: Charged with interviewing a beautiful and enigmatic murder suspect, police inspector Hae-joon (Park Hae-il) approaches the assignment with a mix of detached professionalism and burning curiosityâcontradictory sensations channelled back at him by his subject, Seo-rae (Tang Wei), whose sphinx-like unreadability somehow suggests openness and guile at the same time. In a movie in which nearly every shot is calibrated to distill and convey dramatic and thematic information, their interrogation room meet-cute stands out as an example of how directorial imagination can transform conventions into visual coups. EO Sideshow/Janus Films The spaces in Polish director Jerzy Skolimowskiâs donkey-on-the-loose drama range from grittily realistic to hauntingly abstract. For example: the elevated, eerily symmetrical bridge that serves as EOâs final checkpoint on an incredible journey whose ultimate destination is, sadly, never really in doubt. Thatâs only a spoiler if you consider mortality a spoiler, and Skolimowskiâs ability to make his locations feel increasingly tinged by death is central to EOâs uncanny formal power. Here, the idea of crossing over gets literalized through a composition that also gestures toward some larger, cosmic sense of indifferenceâa figure dwarfed by his surroundings. That both the dam and the bridge are man-made structures is also important to the sequenceâs ultimate meaning; through the film, weâre asked to consider the relationship between ecology and industry, and the disastrous condition of the planet around us. Through Skolimowskiâs keen directorial eye, beauty itself becomes weaponized; if the shot is a postcard, itâs being sent to (or from) the edge. The Fabelmans Universal Pictures Heâs got the whole world in his hands: Alone in the dark, projecting his own painstakingly captured Super 8 footage onto outstretched palms, young Sammy Fabelman a

From âNopeâ to âThe Fabelmans,â this year featured plenty of perfect compositions
Note: I did not see Avatar: The Way of Water in time for this list, and itâs just as well, sinceâwith a few subtle exceptionsâI usually try to emphasize non-CGI-assisted images in this feature. James Cameronâs status as Hollywoodâs reigning master of seamless, weightless unreality is uncontested, and unlike so many of the directors doing assembly-line work for big-ticket intellectual properties, he actually has a wonderful visual imagination: Generations of genre filmmakers are in his debt. With the Pandoraâs box of Avatar off the table then, I strove to identifyâand annotateâthe compositions (or camera movements) that either crystallized or transcended my memories of the movies around them, several of which ranked among the yearâs best. As usual, a list like this is deeply subjective, and so is the idea of what constitutes a perfect (or extraordinary) shotâwhether the goal should be showing off or self-effacement. My only hope is that these 10 images lead you in the direction of a worthwhile cinematic experience (or 10).
Aftersun
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24300825/1.png)
The photograph coming slowly into focus here serves as an ideal emblem for Charlotte Wellsâs debut feature, Aftersun. Itâs an ostensibly candid moment veilingâand then revealingâsome deeper, sadder truth. Chewing over their joint holiday as they prepare to return to their separate homes, Calum (Paul Mescal) and his daughter Sophie (Frankie Corio) allow their minds to wander briefly to the idea of a never-ending beach vacationâan idyll away from the responsibilities awaiting them in the UK. âWhy,â asks Sophie in a small, happy voice, âcanât we just stay?â The answer is as simpleâand, in context, as quietly devastatingâas the photographâs development. Time moves forward no matter what, frozen only artificially (and futilely) by memory, or, more reliably, emulsion. Wells holds on the shot for what feels like a miniature eternity, as if she canât bear to let the details sharpenâor to let go of her characters and their bond, leading to a final segment thatâs dominated by melancholy evocations of departure both literal and (meta)physical. At once nostalgic and unsparing, Aftersun is the cinematic equivalent of a long goodbye; the photograph, which is special precisely because itâs so ordinary, leaves Sophie (and us) with something to hold on to.
Decision to Leave
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24300829/9.png)
There are two sides to every story, and in his dazzling new thriller Decision to Leave, South Korean auteur Park Chan-wook skillfully emphasizes duality at every turn. Working in tandem with cinematographer Kim Ji-yong, Parkâwho rightly won a directing prize at Cannesâgenerates visual interest in nearly every frame, all without overwhelming the humming momentum of the story. One trick works especially well: When shooting interiors, he places his characters behind glass or against mirrors to hint at the multitudes they contain. Case in point: Charged with interviewing a beautiful and enigmatic murder suspect, police inspector Hae-joon (Park Hae-il) approaches the assignment with a mix of detached professionalism and burning curiosityâcontradictory sensations channelled back at him by his subject, Seo-rae (Tang Wei), whose sphinx-like unreadability somehow suggests openness and guile at the same time. In a movie in which nearly every shot is calibrated to distill and convey dramatic and thematic information, their interrogation room meet-cute stands out as an example of how directorial imagination can transform conventions into visual coups.
EO
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24300833/6.png)
The spaces in Polish director Jerzy Skolimowskiâs donkey-on-the-loose drama range from grittily realistic to hauntingly abstract. For example: the elevated, eerily symmetrical bridge that serves as EOâs final checkpoint on an incredible journey whose ultimate destination is, sadly, never really in doubt. Thatâs only a spoiler if you consider mortality a spoiler, and Skolimowskiâs ability to make his locations feel increasingly tinged by death is central to EOâs uncanny formal power. Here, the idea of crossing over gets literalized through a composition that also gestures toward some larger, cosmic sense of indifferenceâa figure dwarfed by his surroundings. That both the dam and the bridge are man-made structures is also important to the sequenceâs ultimate meaning; through the film, weâre asked to consider the relationship between ecology and industry, and the disastrous condition of the planet around us. Through Skolimowskiâs keen directorial eye, beauty itself becomes weaponized; if the shot is a postcard, itâs being sent to (or from) the edge.
The Fabelmans
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24300832/10.png)
Heâs got the whole world in his hands: Alone in the dark, projecting his own painstakingly captured Super 8 footage onto outstretched palms, young Sammy Fabelman appears to us as creator, viewer, and screen all at once. Itâs a holy trinity that, as visualized by Steven Spielberg at his late-career image-making peak, signifies something deeply metaphysical about filmgoing and filmmakingâthat the artist must imagine himself amidst the audience. (The trademark Spielberg Face, conveying awe at the power of cinema, is also on display.) Sammyâs close encounter is also tactile in a way that reaches back through the digital mist to cinemaâs tactile, handmade 20th century history. For another filmmaker, Sammyâs rapture would be a landmark composition. For Spielberg, itâs just one more for the all-time highlight reel.
Hit the Road
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24300835/8.png)
A chip off the old block, emerging Iranian director Panah Panahi honored his fatherâthe much celebrated and politically embattled Jafar Panahiâwith the swift, inventive travelogue Hit the Road, in which a pair of loving, politically dissident parents must smuggle their older son out of the country to avoid his mandatory military service. For the most part, Panahi shoots his debut in cramped, intimate close-ups that turn his protagonistâs car into a kind of mobile prisonâthereâs no room to maneuver weary heads or aching limbs, and every passing vehicle manifests a potential threat. When the time comes for the parties to go their separate ways, he locks into a distanced master shot composition worthy of Stanley Kubrick (whose name, along with that of Christopher Nolan, comes up in conversation during the film via the dialogue of a movie-obsessed child). Panahi conjures up a moment of pastoral beauty that seems to exist out of time even as its arrival confirms that the clock is running out on a family that may never be whole again.
Nope
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24300824/4.png)
The urge to reach out and touch somebody is a very human concept rooted in ideas of empathy and emotional transference. More primalâand persuasiveâis the feeling to recoil from an outstretched hand, especially one powerful enough to rip you limb from limb. If Jordan Peeleâs marvelous, shape-shifting horror thriller Nope is, on some level, a meditation on our collective, hardwired responses toward fight or flight, the terrifying (and tragic) mid-film set piece depicting a sitcom taping gone haywire delineates the stakes with clear, comic-book precision. The imperiled child actor debating whether to fistbump his rampaging simian costar (and in doing so, soothe him) is caught not only between fast-twitch, life-or-death instincts but, more abstractly, between reassuring televisual fantasy and brutal realityâand wondering if one can redeem or rescue the other. The reference points for the image are obvious: Michelangeloâs The Creation of Adam on down to Kubrick and Spielbergâbut its actual meaning remains fluid, especially since fate (in the form of a SWAT team) intervenes before Nature can take its course one way or another.
RRR
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24300828/7.png)
In a remarkable upset, S.S. Rajamouliâs hyperbolic Tollywood action epic earned a Best Director citation from the New York Film Critics Circleâa possible precursor to an Oscar nod thatâd make Bong Joon-hoâs presence at the 2020 ceremony seem almost uneventful. Simply put, Indian commercial cinema is virtually invisible in Western-critical tastemaking circles, and the question of why a veteran blockbuster directorâs latest blowout has touched a nerve is worth asking. The film mythologizes a pair of real-life Indian revolutionaries, Alluri Sitarama Raju and Komaram Bheem, as comrades in the battle against the British Raj; in the climax, Raju adopts the imageâand the kick-ass weaponryâof the Hindu god Rama in order to lay waste to colonial forces. RRR does not lack for over-the-top momentsâI could have just as easily included the scene when one of our heroes fights a tiger, or when another hurls flaming motorcycles into the British barracksâbut the backlit, fairy-tale grandeur of Rajuâs quasi-supernatural rebirth stands out as an example of Rajamouliâs adroit pop-cinema chops.
TĂĄr
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24300827/2.png)
Yes, the long take at the center of Todd Fieldâs acerbic character study constitutes an act of showing off: For nearly five minutes, the shot roams, tracks, and reframes around Cate Blanchettâs Lydia TĂĄr as she stalks a Juilliard lecture room discoursing on everything from compositional technique to cancel culture, all without breaking stride, or even a sweat. (Blanchett is electric hereâshe should start practicing those award speeches now.) Thatâs because TĂĄr and its severe, spectacular art-house aesthetics are made in the image of its antiheroineâa case of form fused to content that sometimes works brilliantly. What makes the scene thrilling and appalling is the tightrope it walks (camera in hand) between Lydiaâs virtuoso rhetoric and comfortably tenured punching-down; her desire to make herself the center of attention will have consequences. Later in the film, when Lydiaâs rant gets cut up and decontextualized in a takedown video on Twitter, it makes for a funny, vicious payoff to all that pumped-up, real-time formalismâa reminder that visual language is just as important as oratory.
Weâre All Going to the Worldâs Fair
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24300822/5.png)
Probably the key screenlife horror movie of the millennium so far along with Unfriended, Jane Schoenbrunâs Weâre All Going to the Worldâs Fair unfolds largely across a series of monitors or else features laptops or other mobile devices within its mise-en-scĂšne. Its protagonist, a lonely, isolated preteen named Casey (Anna Cobb) likes to cocoon herself inside internet videos, and in this surpassingly creepy early sequence sheâs confronted by a mysterious upload of her own distorted image, which is projected against a screen so large it dwarfs her. The source of the messageâand the relationship that evolves between Casey and its senderâoffer plot threads to be untangled, but on a purely graphic level the shot evokes a set of disturbing, complex ideas about transformation, disfigurement, and self-loathing that lurk in the margins of the story. Itâs a scene that works as a jump scare but also accrues anxiety with sustained contemplation; the only thing freakier than Casey not recognizing herself in this moment is the possibility that she just might.
X
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24300821/3.png)
Ti Westâs X takes place in 1979, a few years after its wannabe-movie-maker characters surely lined up to see Jaws. Mia Gothâs Max has no idea sheâs sharing her West Texas skinny-dipping excursion with a hungry alligator, and her innocence imbues this birdâs-eye view with the requisite Spielbergian menace. Itâs also a bit of a misdirection, since as the film goes on, our heroine proves to be anything but a damsel in distressâa Final Girl with an ax to grind instead. The best thing about X (and its hastily assembled surprise prequel, Pearl) is how it plays with concepts of predators and prey, and Westâs pleasure in finding unexpected places for his camera is palpable. As for his star reptile, it makes a welcome return cameo in Pearl, leading us to wonder if the gator should somehow be included in the upcoming trilogy-ender MaXXXineâor if, given the L.A. setting, West will manage to find an even slimier antagonist.
Adam Nayman is a film critic, teacher, and author based in Toronto; his book The Coen Brothers: This Book Really Ties the Films Together is available now from Abrams.